Accepted on 19 May 2019
Submitted on 15 May 2019
In 2002, The Ministry of Education promulgated <National Universities Sports Teaching Program Guidance>. The guidance proposed that according to the general requirements of school education and the rules of physical education curriculum, a variety of physical education courses should be opened for all students in order to break the original department and class system and to meet the needs of students at different levels and different interests (Chen, 2018; Li, & Zhou, 2018). The role of students as subjects and the teacher as a guide should be fully played, to advocate open and inquiry teaching, as well as try to extend time and space for physical education. Under the instruction of teachers, students should be able to choose their own course contents, their own teachers and their own class time, to construct a vigorous and lively atmosphere. Sports club teaching mode came into existence and various practical researches have been started in the sports teaching in various colleges (Fan, & Peng, 2018).
Relevant researches can be classified into two categories: The first category focuses on theoretical research, including the significance, basis, development status, construction mode, management system and implementation method of college sports clubs. And the other category focuses on the experience summary, covering the research of current situation of development, combined with the current situation of sports clubs, the corresponding influencing factors and countermeasures are obtained. This article integrates the existing research results, conducts research based on the teaching mode of the college basketball club, and combines with the sustainable development of college basketball teams (Han, 2017; Jin et al. 2010; Li, & Zhou, 2018). And combining the teaching of college basketball club with the training and selection of basketball players, we try to cultivate students’ individual development and enhance their participation to improve the situation of students’ low interest in sports classes teaching. In addition, attention should be paid to the cultivation and selection of professional talents in the club, the development of physical education curriculum resources, the expansion of teaching space, and the enhancement of students’ awareness of independent and conscious participation in physical exercise.
Integration mode of college basketball club teaching and basketball players training is to integrate the selection and training of basketball players into basketball club teaching and implement the hierarchical teaching of the basketball club, which means that basketball club is divided into primary, intermediate and advanced classes (Liu, & Liu, 2018; Han, 2017).
In the actual teaching process, coaches need to patiently explain and guide the students, in order to clarify the training objectives of primary, intermediate and advanced classes. Otherwise, students will overestimate or underestimate their basketball level. This will result in basketball level disparity in the same class, bring adverse situations to the club teaching. Because of the level of disparity, it is difficult for the club’s coaches to give effective guidance. Students of high level do not learn enough, while students of general level cannot learn well. Instead, it will reduce students’ interest in basketball. Therefore, the main problem is how to make the same class in the same basketball level (Liu, & Wang, 2017; Wang, 2018). There are some possible solutions:
Students’ satisfaction is an important index to evaluate teachers’ teaching effect. This article selects the comprehensive data of the students’ satisfaction of the school about never set up a club and has set up a club in the period of 7 years. And we compare the comprehensive evaluation data from the office of academic affairs. The details are as follows.
As can be seen from the Table 1 below, students’ satisfaction with teaching and with teachers increases steadily after the implementation of the integrated training mode. This indicates that students’ recognition of basketball teaching also reflects that students are more interested in basketball than before.
Table 1
Comparison and analysis of students’ satisfaction with the teaching.
| Items | Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The situation of the basketball club | Never been set up | Have been set up | |||||
| Year | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
| Students’ satisfaction with teaching (%) | 85.3 | 86.5 | 86.2 | 89.3 | 90.2 | 91.3 | 90.8 |
| Students’ satisfaction with teachers (%) | 83.4 | 85.7 | 84.6 | 90.3 | 89.7 | 91.6 | 90.9 |
The training of athletes is an important basis for evaluating the effectiveness of this teaching mode. This article selects the basic relevant data of our basketball team for comparison. The details are as follows.
As it can be seen from the total number of players in the basketball team and the number of awards in Table 2 below, this teaching model has great advantages in the number of basketball team members and their personal quality. And as it can be seen from the number of times the basketball team participated in the competitions inside and outside the school that this teaching mode has effectively improved the interest of students in basketball.
Table 2
Comparison and analysis of athletes’ training.
| Items | Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The situation of a basketball club | Never been set up | Have been set up | |||||
| Year | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
| The total number of players in the basketball team | 16 | 18 | 17 | 32 | 35 | 33 | 34 |
| The number of times the basketball team participated in the competitions inside the school | 23 | 20 | 21 | 44 | 40 | 39 | 46 |
| The number of times the basketball team participated in the competitions outside school | 22 | 16 | 17 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Number of awards | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
Student-athletes can only be recruited by means of vigorous publicity before there is no basketball club in the selection and training of male and female athletes in the school basketball team. This may lead to the following problems.
Firstly, due to this insufficient publicity, students with considerable basketball potential may not come to the interview so that we will miss some great athletes. Secondly, coaches determined the players only through height, weight, simple basketball activities, and technical skill tests, so the players that selected are often not comprehensive enough, which restricts the development of the basketball team.
Under the current condition that most colleges have their own basketball club, the combination of club teaching, athlete selection, and training have the following advantages.
Firstly, wide selection can provide a large selection base. Secondly, through the basketball club internal teaching competition and selection, the level of basketball among the students has improved rapidly. What’s more, it can objectively reflect the competitive level of student-athletes. Finally, it can provide important reference basis for coaches in terms of the substitutes in different positions of the team. Through the teaching and training for the advanced class of the basketball club, the student-athletes with the potential of the competition will be guided to join the school basketball team, which plays an active role in promoting the construction of the basketball team. And then the effective unification of mode integration of college basketball club teaching and athletes training could be achieved (Li, & Zhou, 2018).
Based on the idea of “health first” and “lifelong physical education”, this article studies the integration mode of college basketball club teaching and training for college basketball players. The practical results are used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the construction of the teaching mode, and the following further study of the mode and the long-term development of student sports education are put forward feasible countermeasures. The results of this study will have an impact on the teaching mode of other related sports, and it will provide a reference for the reform of physical education teaching mode in colleges (Wu, 2018; Zhang, 2018).
The author has no competing interests to declare.
Chen, Y. (2018). The Current Situation of Basketball Teaching in Colleges and Universities and its Optimization Countermeasures [J]. Contemporary Sports Science and Technology, 6, 49.
Fan, P., & Peng, Q. (2018). Effects of Supplemental Sodium Bicarbonate on Physiological Stress and Exercise Capacity of High-intensity Interval Training of Male Basketball Players [J]. Journal of Guangzhou Physical Education Institute, 38(3), 103–108.
Han, Z. (2017). Optimization of Basketball Teaching Operation—Comment on “Theory and Practice of Basketball Teaching in Colleges and Universities” [J]. Education Development Research, 18, 92.
Jin, H., Fan, H., Liu, W., et al. (2010). Thoughts on the Teaching Reform of College Basketball Courses [J]. Journal of Physical Education, 17(8), 68–71.
Li, H., & Zhou, Y. (2018). The Misconduct Behavior of the Stadium of Professional Basketball League and Its Containment Strategy [J]. Journal of Guangzhou Physical Education Institute, 38(2), 85–90.
Liu, X., & Liu, W. (2018). Research on the Factors Affecting the Growth of Chinese Men’s Basketball Professional League Club [J]. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 41(7), 24–32.
Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2017). Analysis of the Development of Foreign Coaches in CBA Clubs [J]. Sports Culture Guide, 3, 102–107.
Wang, S. (2018). Analysis of the Close Value of Attack and Defense Ability of Chinese Team and Opponents in the 28th Asian Men’s Basketball Championships [J]. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 52(2), 88–94.
Wu, J. (2018). The Application of Basketball Game in Basketball Teaching in Higher Vocational Education [J]. Today Fortune, 9, 190.
Zhang, Y. (2018). Application of Functional Training in Basketball Physical Fitness Training [J]. Theatre House, 2, 147.